To give some nuance on the quote "Experimental evidence + logical deduction can never prove that either the deterministic or the indeterministic view is impossible": We can indeed rule out a local hidden variable model [1].
So if the deterministic view is true, then it has to be a holistic theory. The hidden variables must be global, i.e. "accessible" throughout the universe. They cannot be attached to a particle as in Whittaker's model or Schrödinger's modification.
Schrödinger's fix to Whittaker's photon argument was to let the hidden variable take any value between zero and one, instead of just two. It's funny that such a small change was enough to rebuild the quantum probabilities.
I was hoping it established that the cat is ginger
readthenotes1
A good example of a monster whose professional life benefits the world.
Worth the cost? I'd say not, but I'm generally an optimist.
show comments
rramadass
Great article on an interesting topic.
The article mentions the great Physicist, Prof. S.N.Bose's take in a lecture delivered to the Indian Science Congress in 1944. It is titled "The Classical Determinism and The Quantum Theory".
The corresponding pdf can be found at Prof.S.N.Bose archive under Section 6 "Documents" titled "Presidential address at the Indian Science Congress, Delhi,1944 [Current Science, Vol XIII, No. 1]" - https://www.bose.res.in/Prof.S.N.Bose-Archive/
Prof. S.N.Bose is the Physics great after whom "Bosons", "Bose-Einstein Statistics", "Bose-Einstein Condensate" and even "Higgs Boson" are named - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyendra_Nath_Bose
show comments
justauserid
I just want to know what happened to the cat, eventually. Like for real – beyond the (academic) (un)certainties.
Robert W. Spekkens (and I guess Matt Leifer) tried to model quantum uncertainty classically.
(my gut feeling was: it works till it does not work)
"In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory"
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0401052
To give some nuance on the quote "Experimental evidence + logical deduction can never prove that either the deterministic or the indeterministic view is impossible": We can indeed rule out a local hidden variable model [1].
So if the deterministic view is true, then it has to be a holistic theory. The hidden variables must be global, i.e. "accessible" throughout the universe. They cannot be attached to a particle as in Whittaker's model or Schrödinger's modification.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHSH_inequality
Schrödinger's fix to Whittaker's photon argument was to let the hidden variable take any value between zero and one, instead of just two. It's funny that such a small change was enough to rebuild the quantum probabilities.
Can this shed light on determinism v free will ?
https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/api/object/o:167065/download [PDF]
I was hoping it established that the cat is ginger
A good example of a monster whose professional life benefits the world.
Worth the cost? I'd say not, but I'm generally an optimist.
Great article on an interesting topic.
The article mentions the great Physicist, Prof. S.N.Bose's take in a lecture delivered to the Indian Science Congress in 1944. It is titled "The Classical Determinism and The Quantum Theory".
The corresponding pdf can be found at Prof.S.N.Bose archive under Section 6 "Documents" titled "Presidential address at the Indian Science Congress, Delhi,1944 [Current Science, Vol XIII, No. 1]" - https://www.bose.res.in/Prof.S.N.Bose-Archive/
Prof. S.N.Bose is the Physics great after whom "Bosons", "Bose-Einstein Statistics", "Bose-Einstein Condensate" and even "Higgs Boson" are named - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyendra_Nath_Bose
I just want to know what happened to the cat, eventually. Like for real – beyond the (academic) (un)certainties.