bananamogul

All the states that participated in the class action settlement got $725 million combined.

New Mexico decided to go it alone and gets $25 billion.

Great timing for the AG who’s up for reelection on November 3 (even though it was the previous AG who made the call).

show comments
lenerdenator

They were originally sued for, what, half a trillion?

Pennies on the dollar.

yodsanklai

Any reason why META surged after hours? is that related to this news?

show comments
nidnogg

People are not notifying this nearly enough, but Meta is still going up and at it in Brazil [1] during one of the most polarized elections I've ever seen during my time.

Things got so ridiculous that Meta's AI WhatsApp companion would let you generate one candidate's posters, but flat-out deny you the same prompt for the opposition. Of course the bias skewed heavily towards benefiting the alt-right, pro-MAGA party.

[1] - https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/meta-employees-said-l...

show comments
mike_bob

Not enough.

MiroslavPokorny

Another example why Third party Advertising needs to be banned and also put on the list of human rights by the UN.

The inbalance between good and bad consequences from third party advertising is just completely broken.

devsda

> While the full amount of the penalty against Meta, based on thousands of violations of state law, was calculated as $219bn, Judge Mathew reduced the penalty to the $25bn fine.

umm when a thief steals and gets caught, we don't just punish them. We also recover what was stolen.

They should also be made to delete all user data collected during the period, and pause similar data collection for x months/years even the ones that fall under their service terms. The price of wrong doing should be high, and for meta deleting historical user data is the highest form of punishment .

Otherwise it's just cost of business.

show comments
nalekberov

It’s crazy how these criminals can get away with it just by paying money. Sure, $25B isn’t peanuts, but this money shouldn’t have belonged to companies like Meta to begin with.

ok123456

The Cambridge Analytica "scandal" is basically an advertising campaign for Meta itself. Their ad platform worked exactly as designed: it allowed creepy, microtargeted advertisements. Instead of dish soap, peptides, and dropshipped garbage, it sold a political candidate.

Much worse is how Meta enabled a genocide in Myanmar.

show comments
tomjen3

How much is Cambridge Analytica going to have to pay? I'm all for ramming Meta, but I feel like they should be forced to pay the same amount.

show comments
ReptileMan

Diseconomies of scale.

gib444

If they actually pay $25B, I'll eat my hat. Hell, I might even eat two of my hats

Noaidi

The original fine was much higher. This is closer to Meta’s hopes than the peoples.

lysace

Previously when the EU has ordered US companies to pay penalties of a "few billion EUR" for trade abuse there has typically been a lot of jingoistic outrage here. This one will be interesting to watch.

show comments
alex1138

So apropos of nothing remember when Zuck bought a castle rather than spend that money on any sort of Facebook account support?

dominotw

i hate that zuck has his ad empire funding all sort of stupid shit. Nothing can even touch him as long as ad dollars keep flowing.

why are ads so so sucessful on meta platform. i hate it so much.

show comments
richwater

Jury based punitive damages are constantly overturned because they are not legal experts and don't understand anything.

Anyone who thinks Meta will actually pay this amount have no clue what they're talking about.

show comments
google234123

We need tort reform in the US. These nuclear verdicts are causing insurance prices to go up. I forget the statistics, but I'm pretty sure every American citizen is paying a $500 to multi-thousand dollar tax because of giant lawsuits like this. Nowhere else in the world has this problem. Lawyers have too much power with politicians.

show comments