I would have gone for FreeBSD myself but alas it didn’t run on the SPARC stuff I lifted out of the company skip :)I think the thing with the BSDs in general was the fact I didn’t always even need any extra software packages on them. The base install was that useful.

I was a fan of FreeBSD over NetBSD; far more driver compatibility in the 1990s. It was nice to play with. Way too hard to use for much (well, online) now, due to the shrinking number of software packages (eg browsers) these days. I still remember how good it used to feel installing NetBSD on (now long long dead) laptop in the early&#x2F;mid-90s.

NetBSD was my favourite playing around OS from the late 1990s to about 2010. Worked on any old crap I had lying around which was mostly thoroughly obsolete SPARC and x86 kit. Did the job. Never went wrong. Good documentation built in. Netbooted on anything.No idea where it is now but this post has inspired me to have a look.

As to why, Gary didn&#x27;t say.. or even contribute again, so we could surmise it was a made-up name to make sure the company he worked for wasn&#x27;t identified, but some of the replies to his mail went into more detail about why they did, you can find them here<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mail-index.netbsd.org&#x2F;netbsd-advocacy&#x2F;2005&#x2F;09&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mail-index.netbsd.org&#x2F;netbsd-advocacy&#x2F;2005&#x2F;09&#x2F;</a>

freebsd = utility: performance, gnu software compatibility, drivers, closest thing to useful as a desktop (still not very), but almost x86 onlyopenbsd = security: internet exposed servicesnetbsd = portability: already ported &#x2F; most easily portable to every cpu arch &amp; platform including old and new obscure ones. If you want a big-endian os for whatever academic reason, it&#x27;s netbsd on an old sun sparc or pi3. I had an HP Jornada that had a SH3 cpu and shipped with wince, the only alternative os on that was netbsd.

Awesome!Two things:1) “We were” (sorry I had to do it).2) Why NetBSD? Why not FreeBSD or Debian or heck even Ubuntu Server or RHEL&#x2F;CentOS (forgot it was 2005)?Glad you got the spend more time with the family!

You could just throw a squirrel carcass in a cardboard box and install netbsd on it

I enjoyed the time I spent browsing the web and reading ebooks while running OpenBSD on a Thinkpad. The same goes for hosting a web page on a VPS I used to rent. I found that what people say about it is true: the documentation is great. To the extent that I needed to tinker I gained a fair amount of coherence about how things worked. This is sort of what I want the guys in my community to experience for themselves.

I have been wanting to do this for a while. I have used FreeBSD and OpenBSD in server or embedded environments, but never as a desktop. And I have zero experience with NetBSD or DragonflyBSD but want to play with those too.

I&#x27;m considering initiating a campaign to influence a community space that I&#x27;m a part of into running NetBSD on some low-risk infrastructure that we may adopt.

&gt; This also lead to more arguments with
the wife (which leads to a decrease in other things... ;)I love the subtlety of the dual-use closing-parenthesis here.

NetBSD is the only Unix that IMO still fun to hack on.. no AI, just hack..

The way it&#x27;s written is ambiguous as it could also just mean the peak demand rate, not a capacity peak. I was doing some benchmarks for something recently and noticed how tricky it is to capture all the nuance of a test in prose.

&gt; 12MB email attachmentsIt was a different time.

&gt; NetBSD during peak hours, our httpd servers can deal with 35
requests per minute(internal and external).even in 2005 this is abysmal. no reflection of netbsd tho - likely a terrible app.

NetBSD and My Life (2005)