Japanese court overturns Red RAW video patent

74 points11 comments4 hours ago
dannyw

Thank god. The actual patent (roughly; I researched it myself, but a few years ago so memory fuzzy) involves compressing frames/video before debayering which makes the streams more easily compressible; instead of after debayering, and as part of a camera (internal RAW). Yeah.

show comments
Wistar

In the past 15 years, I have purchased five Lumix cameras including the new L10 (which I have yet to receive). I like their cameras a lot. The dedication to pursue this battle is another reason I am certain to buy more.

show comments
wmf

This is a terrible patent (it's basically a list of features) and unfortunately Red was able to milk it for almost 20 years.

dabinat

> One possibility the abolition of the license fees reportedly due to Red from users of Apple’s ProRes RAW codec.

This would be great but I’m not going to hold my breath.

grokcodec

I've been waiting for this result for a long time - great news!!

looksjjhg

Wow that’s big!