> My AI is a natural extension of me. It feels like a sixth sense and another limb. I wonder about a problem, feel as though I’m literally surfing the web, see glimpses of the websites, get flashes of intuition about the problem, and ultimately derive the answer.
We call this AI psychosis.
G3nD
"I feel good about the vision, because it builds towards a more human future" I wonder if the author truly believes this. I could maybe buy some sort of inevitability argument, but this current framing is very hard to take seriously.
MeetingsBrowser
This seems strictly worse than speech to text as input to AI?
I cannot comprehend the output from AI fast enough for the speed difference between a verbal and thought response to matter.
Not to mention the privacy nightmare of logging my raw thoughts in a corporate environment and potentially routing them to an LLM provider.
Dependance
What is the benefit ?
Sharing thoughts to the external world would be like going to a bakery and walking out with flour and eggs.
Isn't the act of talking/writing part of the thinking ? Am I just going to share intrusive thoughts and half-baked ideas to my CIA agent now ?
show comments
tylerrobinson
> I want to feel what my Codex feels.
Yeesh. I guess that makes one of us. Truly one of the more horrifying short stories I’ve read.
nullorempty
From the article.
>Thought-to-text, aka telepathy
No, that's not telepathy. I'd leave the term alone. Consider it to be reserved for... well... telepathy!
show comments
cdrnsf
I thought this was a parody when I opened it.
show comments
onemoresoop
Id be curios to see attempts of my nonverbal thoughts in writing. It doesn’t seem possible imo.
mvanbaak
> My GPT-7 agent has been chugging away at the new encoder I’ve been exploring for over a day now.
How much are those people making to be able to afford things like this?
show comments
axus
2040 : I earnestly believe that presidential term limits should be abolished, and also that federal control of elections is incredibly important. Not sure where that thought came from, but I'm certain!
show comments
Animats
Probably more useful for interrogation than coding.
Under current US law, can people entering the US be subjected to mind-reading?
show comments
nyxtom
As though we haven't done enough already to manipulate the mind, now we can have a neural model dictate our thoughts for us.
show comments
voiper1
> My GPT-7 agent... I become .... annoyed at the AI-speak in its first paragraph
When we have GPT-7 it will still do AI-speak?!
lantry
- telepathic communication with your computer
- still annoyed by AI-speak
What a bold vision!
andrethegiant
Visit from CIA in 3, 2, 1...
The only thing I would actually want this for would be a dream logger. Extremely invasive and quite dangerous otherwise.
show comments
sam-cop-vimes
Hmm...how do you stop private thoughts from reaching the LLM? Suddenly you can be prosecuted for thinking the "wrong" thoughts?
show comments
podgietaru
"In a couple years"
In a couple years?! Get over the technical hurdles, do you think PEOPLE will be ready to telepathically talk to a computer in A COUPLE OF YEARS?
show comments
mbgerring
So is it just that these are people who haven’t personally experienced well-intentioned technology turning into a living nightmare? Watching the optimism and then collapse of Web 2.0 was a formative experience for me. I’m 38. Is this just naivete? What is this?
show comments
nee1r
are you specifically focused on non-invasive methods/why? seems like you reach a noise barrier which limits things like this
show comments
RobertDeNiro
This is doomed to fail. Dry EEG electrodes basically only capture noise.
drivebyhooting
You know how a microphone can also serve as a speaker?
Can this technology also do text to thought?
show comments
amoe_
I'd like to think that actually-existing-telepathy would be a more transformative technology than something that simply allows people to do their existing work more conveniently.
foobarian
If it doesn't work try thinking in Russian
zorked
I hope you are unsuccessful in your authoritarian, dystopian enterprise.
baron3dl
who holds the copyright on the transcriptions of my thoughts read by this hardware? what license to those do you impose through EULA? what privacy controls need to be invented to prevent literal thought police?
show comments
yunnpp
> In a couple years, the main way we'll talk with our AIs is with our thoughts. They will not be a super-smart automated intern or coworker that you desperately try to keep up with. They will be a natural, joyful extension of you.
Ah, yes, very joyful indeed.
Also, fuck those interns! They're just too smart to keep up with.
cormorant
Never mind "how could this go wrong". How could this go right?
show comments
platevoltage
I can't wait for this tech to be incorporated into corporate productivity trackers that seem to be getting more popular.
gverrilla
> My AI is a natural extension of me. It feels like a sixth sense and another limb. I wonder about a problem, feel as though I’m literally surfing the web, see glimpses of the websites, get flashes of intuition about the problem, and ultimately derive the answer. It feels fun! My brain is like the Flash. Because of write tech, my thinking is the fastest it's ever been even when I turn my AI off.
I read "race conditions" all over this vision.
mcfdoesdev
My thoughts being beamed to a frontier model where they are monetizable (and used for training) is terrifying.
show comments
rvz
Translation:
"I am a former-OpenAI employee and looking for investors to fund my AI startup."
ACCount37
> non-invasive
Dead in the water.
It's like an omlette. Can't make a neural interface worth a damn without cracking open a few skulls.
show comments
m4ck_
Maybe I’m just demented but i feel like the first time I interface with chatgpt via telepathy it’s going to see my thoughts when the guy in the cube behind me farts or chews loudly, and send the FBI.
What a terrible idea.
agajews
exciting! you could imagine brain transcriptions being very high signal RLHF data that could help align models more deeply to human preference.
baal80spam
If this dystopian future is ever to come, I think those dates need a +100.
slumpt_
I don't think I've ever been so viscerally revolted by the vision of a company.
> The AI is no longer “other”
> My AI is a natural extension of me. It feels like a sixth sense and another limb. I wonder about a problem, feel as though I’m literally surfing the web, see glimpses of the websites, get flashes of intuition about the problem, and ultimately derive the answer.
We call this AI psychosis.
"I feel good about the vision, because it builds towards a more human future" I wonder if the author truly believes this. I could maybe buy some sort of inevitability argument, but this current framing is very hard to take seriously.
This seems strictly worse than speech to text as input to AI?
I cannot comprehend the output from AI fast enough for the speed difference between a verbal and thought response to matter.
Not to mention the privacy nightmare of logging my raw thoughts in a corporate environment and potentially routing them to an LLM provider.
What is the benefit ? Sharing thoughts to the external world would be like going to a bakery and walking out with flour and eggs. Isn't the act of talking/writing part of the thinking ? Am I just going to share intrusive thoughts and half-baked ideas to my CIA agent now ?
> I want to feel what my Codex feels.
Yeesh. I guess that makes one of us. Truly one of the more horrifying short stories I’ve read.
From the article.
>Thought-to-text, aka telepathy
No, that's not telepathy. I'd leave the term alone. Consider it to be reserved for... well... telepathy!
I thought this was a parody when I opened it.
Id be curios to see attempts of my nonverbal thoughts in writing. It doesn’t seem possible imo.
> My GPT-7 agent has been chugging away at the new encoder I’ve been exploring for over a day now.
How much are those people making to be able to afford things like this?
2040 : I earnestly believe that presidential term limits should be abolished, and also that federal control of elections is incredibly important. Not sure where that thought came from, but I'm certain!
Probably more useful for interrogation than coding.
Under current US law, can people entering the US be subjected to mind-reading?
As though we haven't done enough already to manipulate the mind, now we can have a neural model dictate our thoughts for us.
> My GPT-7 agent... I become .... annoyed at the AI-speak in its first paragraph
When we have GPT-7 it will still do AI-speak?!
- telepathic communication with your computer
- still annoyed by AI-speak
What a bold vision!
Visit from CIA in 3, 2, 1...
The only thing I would actually want this for would be a dream logger. Extremely invasive and quite dangerous otherwise.
Hmm...how do you stop private thoughts from reaching the LLM? Suddenly you can be prosecuted for thinking the "wrong" thoughts?
"In a couple years"
In a couple years?! Get over the technical hurdles, do you think PEOPLE will be ready to telepathically talk to a computer in A COUPLE OF YEARS?
So is it just that these are people who haven’t personally experienced well-intentioned technology turning into a living nightmare? Watching the optimism and then collapse of Web 2.0 was a formative experience for me. I’m 38. Is this just naivete? What is this?
are you specifically focused on non-invasive methods/why? seems like you reach a noise barrier which limits things like this
This is doomed to fail. Dry EEG electrodes basically only capture noise.
You know how a microphone can also serve as a speaker?
Can this technology also do text to thought?
I'd like to think that actually-existing-telepathy would be a more transformative technology than something that simply allows people to do their existing work more conveniently.
If it doesn't work try thinking in Russian
I hope you are unsuccessful in your authoritarian, dystopian enterprise.
who holds the copyright on the transcriptions of my thoughts read by this hardware? what license to those do you impose through EULA? what privacy controls need to be invented to prevent literal thought police?
> In a couple years, the main way we'll talk with our AIs is with our thoughts. They will not be a super-smart automated intern or coworker that you desperately try to keep up with. They will be a natural, joyful extension of you.
Ah, yes, very joyful indeed.
Also, fuck those interns! They're just too smart to keep up with.
Never mind "how could this go wrong". How could this go right?
I can't wait for this tech to be incorporated into corporate productivity trackers that seem to be getting more popular.
> My AI is a natural extension of me. It feels like a sixth sense and another limb. I wonder about a problem, feel as though I’m literally surfing the web, see glimpses of the websites, get flashes of intuition about the problem, and ultimately derive the answer. It feels fun! My brain is like the Flash. Because of write tech, my thinking is the fastest it's ever been even when I turn my AI off.
I read "race conditions" all over this vision.
My thoughts being beamed to a frontier model where they are monetizable (and used for training) is terrifying.
Translation:
"I am a former-OpenAI employee and looking for investors to fund my AI startup."
> non-invasive
Dead in the water.
It's like an omlette. Can't make a neural interface worth a damn without cracking open a few skulls.
Maybe I’m just demented but i feel like the first time I interface with chatgpt via telepathy it’s going to see my thoughts when the guy in the cube behind me farts or chews loudly, and send the FBI.
What a terrible idea.
exciting! you could imagine brain transcriptions being very high signal RLHF data that could help align models more deeply to human preference.
If this dystopian future is ever to come, I think those dates need a +100.
I don't think I've ever been so viscerally revolted by the vision of a company.
Why I'm Leaving OpenAI to build the Torment Nexus
Thanks, I hate this.