For those who don’t have math extensions in the browser, if that is 2^0.6039, then why don’t math extensions just detect math syntax and style it directly?
show comments
slwvx
I was very happy to see an "AI use disclosure" right on the title page under the abstract.
It's not clear if this is solely a possible theoretical result or if it has any practical value. I.e. is it only useful on lattices that are so large as to not be of use, or could it be used for cryptanalysis? If one is using AI to generate a theory paper such as this, why not use the AI to also generate code that uses it, put it on GitHub, and show the results, say against fplll and the tool in the paper below?
For those who don’t have math extensions in the browser, if that is 2^0.6039, then why don’t math extensions just detect math syntax and style it directly?
I was very happy to see an "AI use disclosure" right on the title page under the abstract.
It's not clear if this is solely a possible theoretical result or if it has any practical value. I.e. is it only useful on lattices that are so large as to not be of use, or could it be used for cryptanalysis? If one is using AI to generate a theory paper such as this, why not use the AI to also generate code that uses it, put it on GitHub, and show the results, say against fplll and the tool in the paper below?
https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/35237/35237.pdf
could this be a problem for the security of Falcon (aka FN-DSA) post quantum signature scheme?
Wow, just yesterday I was thinking this exact problem would be a good candidate for AI. Seems it is!