It&#x27;s a wall of text about a kernel stack overflow. I&#x27;m not sure where the &quot;Elton John&quot; part is. Is it... that they used an accent color?

You&#x27;re not going to get anywhere in the security sector unless you gain notoriety i.e. are noticed.This appears to come from dressing up like Elton John in a feather suit and hiring a marketing team.

&gt; You are strictly better off with the website than without it.Why? This is a better resource in every way: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cgit.freebsd.org&#x2F;src&#x2F;commit&#x2F;?id=000d5b52c19ff3858a6f0cbb405d47713c4267a4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cgit.freebsd.org&#x2F;src&#x2F;commit&#x2F;?id=000d5b52c19ff3858a6f...</a>It details the actual problem instead of showing off tired stack exploit tricks.

Why not? This weird complaint has been happening since ~2010 and it has never made any sense. You are strictly better off with the website than without it. When it was vulnerability researchers getting all peevish about the status competition they were running, I at least understood where the complaint was coming from, but even among practitioners, branded vulnerabilities are so much the norm at this point that there&#x27;s no status implication anymore.

The cool kiddies wait and time their disclosures on the cool numbers.

It gives legitimacy to whatever whimsical name was given to a vulnerability by registering the domain.CVE numbers are for boring professionals.

Have you not done anything remotely interesting for you that you want to build a website so the whole world can see it?

What?Is there something in this website that feels unnecessary? It seems like a good format of sharing high quality information.This looks like a full bug into a complete root escalation of a kernel. That&#x27;s hard to do and deserving of praise. The fact that we have a writeup organized like this is awesome.-------This is sort of the expert level stuff that I thought HackerNews would most enjoy.

Why does this need to be a whole ass website

Maybe they&#x27;re not up to snuff on yesterday? They published this yesterday.&gt; The bug was silently fixed in the main branch on 2025-11-27 (commit 000d5b52c19ff3858a6f0cbb405d47713c4267a4) as a side effect of a broader function refactoring. The fix has not been backported to stable&#x2F;14 or releng&#x2F;14.4. FreeBSD 14.4-RELEASE remains vulnerable.&gt; FreeBSD 15.0 still carries the sizeof(*groups) typo and is therefore vulnerable, but the surrounding code differs enough from 14.4 that the chain primitives developed here do not lift the overflow into a working LPE on that branch. On 15.0 the bug remains a kernel panic triggered by any unprivileged user.

Not sure why this is saying it isn’t patched, they released the notice including fix for 14.4 yesterday?

LPEs are really not impressive enough to warrant names and websites.

I would think that pure-storage NAS or network equipment
was effectively completely immune to local privilege escalation. I&#x27;ll give you the NAS where it might be running untrusted containers or such, but that&#x27;s it.

They&#x27;ve been moving their NOSes to a linux based platform.

Juniper JunOS is based on FreeBSD IIRC.

FreeBSD was the reason I chose TrueNAS Core. Unfortunately, you are right, TrueNAS Scale (Linux) is where they are focusing all their attention.
 At this point I will not purchase additional TrueNAS equipment as I feel I was &quot;rug pulled.&quot; I get that they are going after more of the Docker container&#x2F;app market, but I just want a solid ZFS w&#x2F;excellent networking NAS device. Linux is close to this ideal, but it isn&#x27;t as &quot;Set and Forget&quot; as FreeBSD (IMO).

Alas, TrueNAS actually switched to Linux a couple of years ago.

PlayStation 4 was a fork of FreeBSD 9, and is immune to this bug introduced in 14. Sony also changes a LOT, I&#x27;m not sure anything dealing with unix credentials even exists in this fork. It&#x27;s not clear how much FreeBSD is even used in PlayStation 5 (2020), but it would be based off 12 or earlier (also immune to this bug from 14) (13 was released in 2021).

Also Netgate&#x27;s devices running PFSense.

TrueNAS was, but they now use Linux as the main distribution.

TrueNAS is on FreeBSD, as well as lots of network equipment. This does affect us more than we think as operators.

FatGid: FreeBSD 14.x kernel local privilege escalation