I'm an atheist, but most of what I have heard from popes in recent years seems like sound and possibly needed advice.

Also, even though I feel AI and robotics are very important for progressing humanity, I think that much of the world has long since lost a proper sense of intrinsic human value. It's really gone from overt exploitation to slightly more mild exploitation where we pretend the system is really merit based.

And as AI and robotics remove the need for human labor, I hope that someone like the pope can convince people that we should value human beings inherently and more fairly. Inexpensive labor and intelligence should make this feasible.

I hope the speech isn't something dumb like "remember only humans have souls" because I think that's really premature and pretty obvious that AIs are not people at this point.

The really convincing and somewhat deeper simulations of humans are probably only a few years down the line though.

Which comes back to the Rovelli dualism article that was on the front page before. I think we should not be in a hurry to try to duplicate humans in depth (such as imitating emotions, pain, stream of consciousness, self-preservation, etc). It's just completely unnecessary to go that far to get useful AI, and obviously unethical to subject a real human emulation to slavery.

I'm not religious and haven't been since 2008. However, the world today is very different from then. It's fragmented, far more authoritarian, much more dangerous, with "us vs them" mentalities just gaining more and more traction in general in so many countries. There are almost no political leaders left in the world offering a vision that is distinct from mere survival instinct or domination or some mixture of the two. In the last decade we've seen the rise of multiple world-historical tyrants. Meanwhile, many major religions have lost all moral credibility due to continued decades of horrible violence. I can't believe I'm saying this, but it'd be nice to see some real, genuine world leadership from the Pope right now.

The title seems to be editorialized. To me, it makes it sound like Christopher Olah (the mentioned Anthropic co-founder) is a co-author. Instead he is going to be one of several speakers present when the encyclical is released.

It's a tall order to live up to the impact of Rerum novarum, the encyclical by the former Pope Leo that greatly guided thinking out of the industrial revolution. Personally, I'm excited to read this. If we take the claims of most AI labs at face value, they believe their work will fundamentally change the relationship between humans and the economy. More involvement from faith leaders is a good thing.

Related: https://observer.com/2026/03/the-catholic-priest-who-helped-...

Chris Olah, one of Anthropic’s co-founders, got in touch. What followed was, by McGuire’s own description, mind-blowing. “They basically were asking for direct help from the Vatican to convene and help the industry, because the industry was going so fast down this road,” he recalled.

It will be interesting to see how the Pope's more human centered view clashes with Anthropic's rhetoric around replacing humans with AI

I wonder what language the encyclical was written in. Could it be the first one originally English?

Can someone explain to me what encyclical is, and what is it significance in the history of the Catholic Church?

Preaching to the choir.

We don't need popes or effing machines to tell us what we're doing wrong. We all already know that.

What we do need is a lot more ordinary people to do something about it.

I wonder if the encyclical will incorporate material or take guidance from “Antiqua et nova”[1], the 2025 doctrinal note of the Catholic Church co-issued by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Dicastery for Culture. The Note addresses “the anthropological and ethical challenges raised by AI—issues that are particularly significant, as one of the goals of this technology is to imitate the human intelligence that designed it.” I sincerely hope it builds on it.

[1] https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/docu...

Title is: Pope's first encyclical on preserving the human person in AI age coming May 25

This reminds me of the second half of the Hyperion cantos by Dan Simmons

Fairly disappointed that it’s not Amodei/Amor Dei there. A terrible blow for nominative determinism.

Hmm, there’s probably a good reason for this, but it feels weird to involve people who are openly atheist and, moreover, against religion in an event like this.

I hope it's some sort of covert invitation to convert/repent. The doors are always open for those who want to cross it :).

This article needs to be retitled, as it stands it's misleading.

Papal Encyclicals[0] are solely authored by the Pope, even if there has been secular scholarship involved in the writing. It is never "presented" by anyone else, and to frame it as presented primarily by Christopher Olah "alongside" the pope is to betray an ignorance of what's officially going on.

Not sure how we arrived at the present title, "Anthropic co-founder to present AI encyclical alongside Pope Leo XIV", but it makes as much sense as "Iceberg nearly completes mainden voyage across Atlantic, with famous ship as passenger."

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclical#Catholic_usage

Another weird thing is this religious group trying to exert control over the AI companies:

https://newsroom.ap.org/detail/Techisturningincreasinglytore...

Why are the AI companies meeting with them at all? Just seems uncomfortable and suspicious.

The world is getting real tired of these tech bros.

Who gives a shit what some religious fanatic is doing?

Who is this for? Is this to promote AI to the general Catholic public, or is it some kind of cultural signal to potential conservative institutional customers that Anthropic isn’t just a stereotypical bunch of godless California hippies?

Normally when I see these sorts of things it’s obvious what it is for and why, but this one confuses me.

Amodei seems apropos

Why does this seem like it came out of a meeting where someone kept saying "how can we leverage AI?"

I bet it will be 100 AI written, with guidance, natch, just because...

My expectations for the "encyclical": some kind of take on AI that poses as "conservative" while pushing views strongly opposed to Catholicism.

For anyone concerned about the growing power of giant corporations, the fact that they're doing joint statements with religious leaders is...wow.

Regardless of content, it seems an extra step in solidifying where power lies.