The actual *.tif is available which is even higher quality<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.org&#x2F;download&#x2F;theoriginalfilesofsomewindowswallpapers&#x2F;bliss%20600dpi.tif" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.org&#x2F;download&#x2F;theoriginalfilesofsomewindowswa...</a> (47mb)<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.org&#x2F;details&#x2F;theoriginalfilesofsomewindowswallpapers" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.org&#x2F;details&#x2F;theoriginalfilesofsomewindowswal...</a>

High-res version for your modern desktop:<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.org&#x2F;details&#x2F;bliss-600dpi" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.org&#x2F;details&#x2F;bliss-600dpi</a>

Isn&#x27;t there debate in the community that this photo was actually altered and that he has been lying about it?

Bliss (Photograph)