I know insurance for a launch is typical, but seems really tough to do that for this still “rather experimental” launch. I got to imagine it has costs something like 50% on a project like this.
staplung
The failure of the upper stage is a bummer. If it triggers a months-long review, that will almost certainly bump back the schedule for the prototype Blue Moon lander launch.
WalterBright
Once Elon showed how to do it, and how cost-efficient it was, a rocket company that doesn't do it is not viable.
show comments
dwd
What I was not aware of is how many satellites Amazon already has in LEO for it's own Internet service.
They've been flying under the radar there it would seen.
I know insurance for a launch is typical, but seems really tough to do that for this still “rather experimental” launch. I got to imagine it has costs something like 50% on a project like this.
The failure of the upper stage is a bummer. If it triggers a months-long review, that will almost certainly bump back the schedule for the prototype Blue Moon lander launch.
Once Elon showed how to do it, and how cost-efficient it was, a rocket company that doesn't do it is not viable.
What I was not aware of is how many satellites Amazon already has in LEO for it's own Internet service.
They've been flying under the radar there it would seen.
Video of the booster landing: https://xcancel.com/JeffBezos/status/2045874068763632017
Space is hard.
Losing payloads hurts though, especially for a new platform.