The Osprey is amazing, can’t wait to see what the X-76 can do.
PowerElectronix
It looks like a maintenance nightmare with those clutches to decouple the blades and the mechanisms to have them folded during cruising. Does it even improve substantially in anh metric over the V280 to put money into it?
show comments
porphyra
Cool, I guess this should be able to hover in much more "austere" environments than the F-35B STOVL and the Harrier Jet. Tiltrotor with folding rotor blades sounds very mechanically complex and challenging though.
ceejayoz
So it's an Osprey with a jet in the back?
show comments
kuprel
From the image it doesn't look balanced for VTOL when the propellors are vertical. Also are the jets enabled during VTOL?
show comments
rozab
It's cool they actually still commission concept paintings like this
show comments
0xWTF
So ... we're going to try even harder to put humans in harm's way?
brk
I don't understand the purpose of the Xenon taillight.
bilsbie
So it has jet engines that blades unfold and attach to during takeoff and landing? Why not always use the blades?
show comments
ocdtrekkie
I'm confident with the stellar service and safety record of the V-22 that an even more complex tiltrotor will be a standout success for the military.
show comments
mikkupikku
Why won't they adopt one of Sikorsky's compound helicopters already? They're beautiful and elegant solutions to this problem.
show comments
bilsbie
I’d go for simplicity and do a tail lander.
show comments
idontwantthis
Isn't this need already met by the Bell V280 that the army already selected for it's Blackhawk replacement? What is the big innovation they are going for here?
show comments
dash2
“ With SPRINT, we're not just building an X-plane; we're building options”. Found the guy who couldn’t be bothered to write his own press release…
show comments
tamimio
I think the blades are added there for deception, most likely it won’t have blades.
show comments
crimsoneer
Someone has played the new Deus Ex games
phplovesong
The swedish gripen can do mach2 (2300km/h) and does not need a traditional runway (500 meters of something "flat enough" will do). I assume its way cheaper than something like this.
show comments
rluna828
I wonder is Iran would have gone different if we had captured the Ayatollah instead of killing him. A stealth drop ship like this would have allowed that to happen. The reason why regimes are more likely to negotiate when you capture their leaders is because you might release them. (not a good day for the usurper.)
show comments
greatgib
I can't access darpa.mil. Was it slashdotted because of the article being posted here, or now it is unavailable outside of US?
show comments
HumblyTossed
Hmmm... that just looks like problems. It's a lot of mechanical parts that always have to work correctly.
show comments
sandworm101
Different engines for different phases of flight? It has been tried many times and never really works. Such craft can be made to fly, but never well. The answer has to come from using one set to power all phases.
Id be interested in seeing a turboprop that can transition to a turbofan/jet once the prop is folded away. The f-35 was a step in this direction.
trelliumD
that already exists in the form of Saab Gripen :)
show comments
radicalethics
I wonder what the motivation behind this is. Tactically, why ever show your latest weapon? What is the strategic purpose of this? It's like if I message my opponent in SC2 and tell them exactly what I'm going to tech to. That's ... insane right? Why would anyone do that?
To be clear, this is not a power-point program but a continuation of a long-standing design work with Bell.
Two articles that cover this in depth are: 1. Revised Fold-Away Rotor Aircraft Concepts Emerge From Special Operations X-Plane Program. December 2024: https://www.twz.com/air/revised-fold-away-rotor-aircraft-con...
2. Bell’s Plan To Finally Realize A Rotorcraft That Flies Like A Jet But Hovers Like A Helicopter. September 2021: https://www.twz.com/41997/bells-plan-to-finally-realize-a-ro...
The second article covers decades of prior wind tunnel testing on the folding rotor concept.
Design remings me of something...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidents_and_incidents_involv...
“Where we’re going, we don’t need roads”.
The Osprey is amazing, can’t wait to see what the X-76 can do.
It looks like a maintenance nightmare with those clutches to decouple the blades and the mechanisms to have them folded during cruising. Does it even improve substantially in anh metric over the V280 to put money into it?
Cool, I guess this should be able to hover in much more "austere" environments than the F-35B STOVL and the Harrier Jet. Tiltrotor with folding rotor blades sounds very mechanically complex and challenging though.
So it's an Osprey with a jet in the back?
From the image it doesn't look balanced for VTOL when the propellors are vertical. Also are the jets enabled during VTOL?
It's cool they actually still commission concept paintings like this
So ... we're going to try even harder to put humans in harm's way?
I don't understand the purpose of the Xenon taillight.
So it has jet engines that blades unfold and attach to during takeoff and landing? Why not always use the blades?
I'm confident with the stellar service and safety record of the V-22 that an even more complex tiltrotor will be a standout success for the military.
Why won't they adopt one of Sikorsky's compound helicopters already? They're beautiful and elegant solutions to this problem.
I’d go for simplicity and do a tail lander.
Isn't this need already met by the Bell V280 that the army already selected for it's Blackhawk replacement? What is the big innovation they are going for here?
“ With SPRINT, we're not just building an X-plane; we're building options”. Found the guy who couldn’t be bothered to write his own press release…
I think the blades are added there for deception, most likely it won’t have blades.
Someone has played the new Deus Ex games
The swedish gripen can do mach2 (2300km/h) and does not need a traditional runway (500 meters of something "flat enough" will do). I assume its way cheaper than something like this.
I wonder is Iran would have gone different if we had captured the Ayatollah instead of killing him. A stealth drop ship like this would have allowed that to happen. The reason why regimes are more likely to negotiate when you capture their leaders is because you might release them. (not a good day for the usurper.)
I can't access darpa.mil. Was it slashdotted because of the article being posted here, or now it is unavailable outside of US?
Hmmm... that just looks like problems. It's a lot of mechanical parts that always have to work correctly.
Different engines for different phases of flight? It has been tried many times and never really works. Such craft can be made to fly, but never well. The answer has to come from using one set to power all phases.
Id be interested in seeing a turboprop that can transition to a turbofan/jet once the prop is folded away. The f-35 was a step in this direction.
that already exists in the form of Saab Gripen :)
I wonder what the motivation behind this is. Tactically, why ever show your latest weapon? What is the strategic purpose of this? It's like if I message my opponent in SC2 and tell them exactly what I'm going to tech to. That's ... insane right? Why would anyone do that?