In the examples, there is discrepancy between the source, the diagram, the pieces diagram, and the 3D test each. As someone who is professionally and personally interested in grammars and textiles, I appreciate the fantasy and the vibe of the project but it does not seem to be a functioning demo of anything coherent.

Were any people who work for the garment industry involved in GNL's creation, or is it something that's coming entirely from tech people?

Does GNL support pleats, tucks, and darts? These sewn features help make flat cloth conform to curves in the body. The terms don't seem to be mentioned explicitly in the repo, though maybe they can be implemented with the existing notation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleat | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuck_(sewing) | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dart_(sewing)

Is there a service I can upload a file and get one made and shipped to me? Not necessarily this grament language but others. I have an old and unusual garment I want in an adult size.

This is how a robot thinks of clothing.

And humans.

For another "clothing patterns as code" approach, see https://freesewing.dev/ - also with a more complete UI and editor.

I should just read Wittgenstein.

We already have marvelous designer and Clo3d...

"Dance has Labanotation. Music has staff notation. Architecture has plan/section/elevation conventions. GNL brings the same rigor to garments — a generative descriptive language where a valid expression is sufficient to construct a garment without ambiguity."

AI lmao

The 3D view is broken on Safari and Chrome.

This is just slop. Pretty sure this person has no experience in clothes manufacturing.

Thank you for this

Can we express the drapes and dresses worn in the animes. Because then it will be helpful for the cos players