One thing I found interesting is the terminology around types were not serif and san-serif but roman style and egyptian style. roman is still sort of used this way but I had never heard the term egyptian to refer to san serif letter forms. I wonder when we lost it.
rob74
TIL that "uppercase" and "lowercase" come from the actual cases where the types were stored. When I saw this picture https://cdn8.openculture.com/2025/09/23222831/OC-Printing-Ty... from the article, it all became clear. Even the numbers (for which you don't have to press "shift" on the keyboard either) were also stored in the lower case (which was obviously for the most often used types). Which then translated nicely to the typewriter: no shift for the more commonly used characters (lowercase), shift for the less common (uppercase).
I was looking into early letter forms and found this delightful book on sign-painting from 1878.
https://ia600606.us.archive.org/32/items/artofletteringsi00b...
One thing I found interesting is the terminology around types were not serif and san-serif but roman style and egyptian style. roman is still sort of used this way but I had never heard the term egyptian to refer to san serif letter forms. I wonder when we lost it.
TIL that "uppercase" and "lowercase" come from the actual cases where the types were stored. When I saw this picture https://cdn8.openculture.com/2025/09/23222831/OC-Printing-Ty... from the article, it all became clear. Even the numbers (for which you don't have to press "shift" on the keyboard either) were also stored in the lower case (which was obviously for the most often used types). Which then translated nicely to the typewriter: no shift for the more commonly used characters (lowercase), shift for the less common (uppercase).
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_case#Terminology