I would (and do) pay for this type of UI library. Especially in design, everyone is inspired by everyone else, taking inspiration and ideas from elsewhere is normal... but branding this as "reverse engineered" makes it sound stolen. From the comments, it seems like you're actually just inspired by the work of others, as you've apparently written the code from the ground up, which means you're talented and capable. You should change the branding. Even a name change to something as simple as "Inspired UI" would be a meaningful improvement. I'd like to buy this but I'm not paying for stolen code, and as it's branded now, it seems like stolen code, and I'd have no plausible deniability if it turns out to be stolen code.

This is really impressive. As a portfolio alone, wow -- as a component set, fantastic.

Are these easy to include in Astro? I'd think so (avoiding React etc.) I am currently building with Astro and keeping things as minimal in terms of additional JS files etc as possible.

Couple of notes / questions:

* https://reverseui.com/craft/text-blur-reveal has 'coming soon' from last October, and it's really cool, I'd be tempted to buy it for this alone

* The top of your site has what looks like the dot logo component, but showing numbers and with a Matrix-like effect. Can that be a component too?

* How customisable are these? I saw one comment saying they were not at all and the code was not modifiable. That's a deal-breaker: we all want our own spin on things, not to copy blindly.

I thought I was going to get the code, like the raw code, because I want to modify some styles/components. Instead, I received the component, and I can't make modifications. For example, the "DataFeedingIn" component; I want to be able to change the design, but I received the component without much capability for modification.

i pay $50 for nothing :(

Some of the site definitely looks Rauno-inspired, the back button on a component detail view even says "< Craft" like on his site: https://rauno.me/craft https://rauno.me/craft/interaction-design

Web would be a better place without UI animations.

Lot of people sell similar components (or give them for free), but what I would really be interested in is a course how to make them (properly, e.g. with a11y and performance considerations). Especially in your case, since you are basically selling somebody else's work (the original design), which is a shitty thing to do. You could monetise this in a much more ethical way.

Ah yes, the classic "reverse engineering" (read: blatant design theft) turned into a quick profit scheme. Peak entrepreneurship.

Their X profile proudly displays "UK-based" while conveniently ignoring basic UK business regulations: no company information, no proper invoicing, no VAT details for B2B sales, and mysteriously missing business address requirements.

Looks suspiciously like someone running an under-the-table operation, courting legal trouble not just from the original designers they're "inspired by," but from Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs who tend to take a rather dim view of tax avoidance.

Looks cool, but the site is very heavy! I have an RTX 3070 GPU, and GPU usage went shot to 70% when I opened this website on Firefox.

What about licensing? As you sell them...

Took me a bit to figure out what the four circular icons on the bottom are for (magic wand, robot, envelope, crescent moon). I really wish they had tooltips.

Still doesn't make sense to me why the magic wand just points to the home page (I would have assumed it meant "edit this UI component), the robot links to a profile page (mine? requires login so didn't try), the envelope points to x.com (I expected an envelope for "email this to a friend"), and the crescent moon toggles between light/dark mode (obvious only in retrospect).

How are these components from an accessibility perspective? i.e. does the dots logo work with screen readers?

Fancy animations is all well and good until you start making the website unusable for people who need screen readers, etc

Would love if the site had some more information about how the components are implemented, eg does it use tailwind so they're easily modifiable, is there a light mode and a dark mode for each, can you update the animations to fit your needs, etc. They look good though!

The components looks really cool! However, you're using dark pattern by tricking the user with "Login to access the code" button. After I've gone through the process of signing up and logged in, I still couldn't access the component code. The same button then said "Unlock the code". Clicking on the button takes you to the Pricing page where you can pay $50 to see the component code. That's a dark pattern.

The Caesar Cipher component is displaying incorrectly in Safari. Its elements are positioned off-center. It works fine in Chrome and Firefox.

This is fantastic work! They look beautiful. I hope you make lots of money from them because I know it's a lot of work. I'll be a customer in the near future for sure.

- React - check

- Framer Motion - check

This hit the spot for me.

This is just selling components someone else wrote, right?

Five years ago I could understand the appeal and appreciate the effort required. Today, it’s a matter of seeing others work, taking a screenshot, asking ai to recreate it, and then packaging it into a “library” and selling it for $50.

Maybe I’m alone in the sentiment, but it just rubs me the wrong way.

"Animated UI" is show stopper.

Components look great. I would pay for these if I needed one of them for a project. It would be great if they worked in React Native too.

Nice job. Not a fan of react myself, pretty allergic to it actually, but these look nice.

I love that the glowing orb is a component. Many websites could use an orb.

Let me compensate you for the wait and the battery drain with some pretty animations.

Thanks for sharing, it looks very good. Unfortunately on my system it has very low fps due to software rendering.

The quality is very impressive! Congrats on the launch.

This looks like an AI generated project with a very little effort put into polishing what came out.

I mean, if you find people willing to pay you money then great, good for you. But I don't see anything I wouldn't be able to find on sites like css tricks or tympanus for free.

And I don't even know what I'm paying for, there are no real examples on the page.

But I'll put it in my bookmarks. As soon as you have more components, and I'll find some spare time, I'm willing to give it a try and launch reverse-reverse-ui.com with all components available for free.

is this open sourced?

Absolutely beautiful set here. I'd pay for à la carte.

I don't see any relation with "reverse-engineering". It's just a bunch of animated widgets that look like on other sites.

  "reverse-engineering their components out of curiosity" - Fantastic
  sharing your learnings with the community - Fantastic
  Attempting to make subscription money off the clones - Not so fantastic

[dead]

[dead]